Trump’s Rights Trampled: The Sinister Manhattan Conspiracy

Trump's Rights Trampled: The Sinister Manhattan Conspiracy

It’s a tale as old as time. Maybe not, but it sure seems like it. Former President Donald Trump continuously finds himself at the mercy of the masses who are attempting to discredit his name and legacy. As Americans, we hold dear the right to a fair trial with a jury of our peers. It’s considered a cornerstone of American democracy. Despite this, Trump’s recent New York trial has left many with a bad taste in their mouths, questioning the integrity of our courts and the justice system as we know it today.

The House Judiciary Committee recently took a deep dive into the details surrounding the prosecution of former President Trump by the Manhattan District Attorney’s office. It’s becoming more and more difficult to ignore the elements of partisanship involved. As a matter of fact, the things they’ve uncovered only serve as a reminder to the public. Our nation must remain committed to the rule of law.

The Non-Partisan Charade

In a blistering report, the House Judiciary Committee accuses Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and Judge Juan Merchan of conspiring to violate President Trump’s constitutional and legal rights. DA Bragg’s novel legal theory, dubbed a “Russian-nesting-doll,” tramples the traditional requirements of unanimity for the jury on each element of the criminal offenses.

“The testimony that the Committee and Select Subcommittee have received makes clear that President Trump’s trial was riddled with constitutional defects – defects that should prompt the New York appellate courts to reverse the verdict.”

The Committee labels this as “unconstitutional and unprecedented,” setting a dangerous precedent where the prosecution can manipulate the legal process without check. The selective application of this theory raises significant concerns about the impartiality of the justice system, particularly when used in high-profile cases that carry significant political implications.

Usurping Federal Authority

One of the most egregious transgressions alleged by the Committee involves DA Bragg’s usurpation of the federal government’s exclusive authority to prosecute violations of federal campaign finance laws. This brazen overreach starkly contrasts with the lack of involvement by the Biden-Harris Administration, who chose not to intervene despite their duty to protect federal interests.

“Because President Trump had no notice of the specific charges against him, in particular the underlying crime and its essential elements, he did not have a meaningful opportunity to defend himself from those charges.”

The inaction by the Department of Justice and the Federal Election Commission in this case has profound implications for the very principle of federalism, potentially leading to “50 different standards of what violate[s] federal election law”.

A Gag Order and Biased Justice

Judge Juan Merchan is also under fire for his palpably political and damaging legal rulings. His gag order during the trial compromised President Trump’s ability to present crucial evidence in his defense, a blatant infringement on the right to due process. These actions are all the more disturbing given Judge Merchan’s failure to recuse himself amid allegations of manifest political bias against President Trump. This bias, combined with the judge’s admission of questionable testimony and refusal to allow relevant testimonies, such as that of former Federal Election Commission Chairman Bradley Smith, paints a picture of deliberate and systematic obstruction of justice.

A Call to Action: Reverse the Verdict

In light of the flagrant legal violations that marred the trial, the Committee urges the New York appellate courts to reverse the verdict and dismiss the indictment with prejudice. This move is seen as a crucial step towards restoring faith in our judiciary and safeguarding the fundamental right to a fair trial. The Committee’s stand is a testament to the importance of upholding the Constitution even in cases where political expediency may tempt otherwise. As patriots, we must not only stand in solidarity but also demand a justice system that genuinely seeks the truth and protects the rights of all citizens, regardless of political affiliation.

This isn’t something we as Americans can ignore. The findings from the House Judiciary committee highlight questionable behavior by both the Manhattan DA’s office and Judge Merchan. We can not waver from our commitment to a fair and just system. We simply cannot accept anything less than vigilance as we stay the course in our pursuit of fairness, truth, and justice. Our legal system can not be allowed to be biased. We as a nation simply MUST stand firm.

What do you think of the House Judiciary Committee’s findings? Should Trump’s verdict be reversed? Let us know your thoughts!

More from Around the Web:

House Republicans launch investigation into NY hush money trial:

Myrna believes there needs to be a financial investigation:

Amuse is pointing out a potential FEC rule violation:

Laura Loomer is calling for subpoenas:

Quote of the Day:

“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly.” — Martin Luther King, Jr