Black Lives Matter Criticizes Democrats for Anointing Kamala Harris

Black Lives Matter Criticizes Democrats for Anointing Kamala Harris

We aren’t going to lie. Watching the Democratic Party scramble to reassess their internal machinations is indeed interesting. It’s as if we are watching their inner workings as they fall apart at the seams. President Joe Biden’s decision to drop out of the 2024 race was one thing. The sudden ascension of Vice President Kamala Harris to presumed nominee has created a flurry of discontent as well as endorsement. One could get whiplash from watching the drama unfold.

So here’s a question. Is this chaos caused by a truly undemocratic Democratic Party, or is there something more at play here? Maybe they really all are just puppets?

Endorsements Galore, But Questions Remain

Kamala Harris has received a flurry of endorsements from some of the most influential leaders in the Democratic Party. Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and Hakeem Jeffries are just a few of the heavyweights who have aired their support for her nascent presidential campaign. This level of backing would normally be seen as a significant boon to a candidate. However, not everyone within the party is celebrating this development, and the reasons are twofold.

Accusations of Undemocratic Process

At the center of this dissent is Black Lives Matter (BLM), an influential organization that has been a significant force within progressive circles. BLM has criticized the Democratic Party for not holding a primary election to officially nominate Harris before the Democratic National Convention. The group claims that the party’s actions are a blatant disregard for democratic principles and that the lack of a primary vote amounts to “anointing” Harris without proper process. This raises serious questions about the party’s commitment to the very democracy they so fervently proclaim to defend.

On the other side, some Democrats argue that the need for a primary has been rendered moot by Kamala Harris earning enough delegates to secure the nomination. The Associated Press, however, has refrained from calling her the presumptive nominee due to the possibility of further developments before the convention.

A Need for Democratic Accountability

Black Lives Matter is not alone in their dissatisfaction. Many within the party are uneasy about the lack of democratic process and the potential for elitism within the party ranks. Fears that the party’s elite and wealthy donors are orchestrating this move behind the scenes have ignited a sense of mistrust. This issue is particularly pertinent in the wake of accusations that reproductive rights are being eroded and that the party’s leadership is out of touch with grassroots voters.

Discontent Among Swing-District Democrats

Another significant hurdle Harris faces is the hesitation among swing-district Democrats to support her. These Democrats, who often represent areas with mixed political leanings, are less enthused about Harris due to concerns about prejudice among their constituents. Her background as a prosecutor, for instance, has raised questions among progressive elements who view her as too close to law enforcement.

Kamala Harris undoubtedly has a considerable amount of support, but that doesn’t make any of these concerns less valid. As a matter of fact, she now runs the risk of alienating key pockets within the Democratic voter base. For a party bent on proving it is diverse and open to different viewpoints, this sure is an odd way to go about bringing in a new Presidential candidate.

What do you think? Send us an email with your thoughts. Our editors can’t wait to hear from you.

More from Around the Web:

News Nation talks about Kamala as the Democratic nominee:

Despite the chaos, many Democrats seem excited: