Iowa Committee’s Decision on School Staff, Firearms Raises Eyebrows

Iowa Committee's Decision on School Staff, Firearms Raises Eyebrows

Iowa’s schools are about to enter a new era of security as the state approves regulations allowing staff to carry firearms on campus, sparking a heated debate on safety and deterrence.

At a Glance

  • Iowa committee approves rules for school staff to carry firearms on campus
  • Staff must obtain permits and undergo extensive training
  • Individual school districts decide whether to implement the policy
  • Critics worry about accidental shootings and psychological impact on students
  • Insurance challenges and liability concerns arise for participating districts

Iowa Takes Bold Step to Enhance School Safety

In a move that’s sending ripples through the Hawkeye State, the Iowa Administrative Rules Committee has given the green light to regulations that will allow school staff to carry firearms on campus. This decision, stemming from House File 2586, marks a significant shift in the approach to school safety and has ignited a passionate debate among educators, parents, and lawmakers.

The new policy mandates that school personnel obtain a permit and complete rigorous training, including annual live scenario exercises and quarterly firearms practice, all under the watchful eye of the Iowa Department of Public Safety (DPS). This isn’t a blanket policy, though – the power to decide whether staff can carry firearms rests firmly in the hands of individual school districts.

Support for Local Decision-Making

The Iowa School Boards Association has thrown its support behind the local decision-making aspect of the policy. Emily Piper, representing the association, stated, “We support the local decision making of our boards if they choose to go down this path. We just want the superintendent in the meantime to be as informed as possible as to who has a permit and who might possibly forget that they can’t carry on school grounds.”

“One additional full-time employee was hired on at DPS to help fulfill that requirement, and to develop processes for approving training curriculum and tracking permit holder training,” Kruse said.

This approach allows districts to tailor their security measures to their specific needs and community values. For larger districts with 8,000 or more students, the law requires the presence of a school resource officer or private school security officer, providing an additional layer of protection.

Diverse Responses from School Districts

The reaction from Iowa’s school districts has been mixed. Some, like the Sioux City Community School District, have opted out of arming staff. Leslie Heying, their director of communications, clarified, “Our district does not allow teachers or other school personnel to carry firearms. We have a longstanding partnership with the Sioux City Police Department, and their officers serve as SROs in our buildings.”

On the other hand, districts like Southeast Warren Community School are considering allowing staff to carry firearms, citing potential long response times from law enforcement in rural areas. This highlights the complex balance between immediate response capabilities and the risks associated with having firearms in educational settings.

Addressing Concerns and Challenges

Critics of the policy raise valid concerns about the potential for accidental shootings and the psychological impact on students knowing their teachers may be armed. There are also significant insurance challenges for districts considering arming staff. EMC Insurance, a major provider, has indicated it may drop districts that vote to arm teachers, though it continues to insure schools with armed security through trained law enforcement or school resource officers.

“It just simply comes down to seconds are the most valuable thing on the planet in that situation,” Schultz said. “And anything you can do to remove the number of seconds before somebody with a weapon faces a murderer with a weapon, you’re going to have a lower body count. … A good guy with a gun is going to stop a bad guy with a gun. Not every single time, but you don’t have a chance if the good guy doesn’t have a gun.”

To address these concerns, the legislation provides qualified immunity from criminal and civil liability for damages involving firearm usage by school personnel. This protection aims to ease some of the legal worries that might deter staff from participating in the program.

A Step Towards Safer Schools?

While the debate continues, proponents argue that this policy serves as a crucial deterrent to potential threats and could lead to quicker intervention during emergencies. The tragic shooting at Perry High School on January 4, which resulted in the death of an 11-year-old and injuries to five others, underscores the urgent need for effective school safety measures.

As Iowa schools navigate this new landscape of security, the focus remains on creating safe learning environments for students while balancing the complex issues of gun rights, personal safety, and the psychological well-being of the school community. Only time will tell if this bold move will achieve its intended goal of making Iowa’s schools safer for all.